I love the idea that our “identity” is fluid. I’ve heard the concept “fluid” applied when describing identity within other cultures, in particular, indigenous societies, but these days, I fully adopt the concept in my own life. It’s my true experience. It is freeing. I can be who I AM at any given moment. I do not need to live up to the expectations of the society I participate in (but I can if I want to).

How do we enter that “fluid” form of being? We do it with bricolage, specifically, Joe’s multidimensional critical complex bricolage….I know; I’m a living example. Thus, I “identify” with having many different names, different times, different places—and YET! They are still all ME! And thus, my “consort” has different names, too, and thus, CONTEXT is critical….just like Joe emphasizes in his work.

The other day, I came across another definition of bricolage in Joe’s work (I’ve already extensively analyzed his definitions for bricolage in my dissertation), but this definition is another, perhaps, easy-to-understand definition for beginners. The reason I came across it is because I bought this book, to study in greater detail, Joe’s idea that we’ve been in what he calls a “recovery movement” in which, the global uprisings of the 1950s-early 1960s were met with great and organized resistance from the political “far right.” He says we can expect a return to those earlier uprisings (and, indeed, we’ve been seeing them, such as “Arab Spring” and Yemen and other uprisings around the world). What he means by “far right” and “new right” also needs an analysis, which he did within his conceptualization of who institutes FIDUROD. (You really need to read his Knowledge and Critical Pedagogy: An Introduction to get a full understanding).

But it does not escape me that with Joe’s conceptualizations there is always more…thus, I will discuss in this blog the concept in relation to “right hand” (traditional) physics and “left hand” (theoretical) physics and how the twain might meet; In fact, they ARE meeting! If physicists can do it, why can’t we all? 

So, in Joe’s article that I had been specifically guided to acquiring and reading, “How did this happen? The right-wing politics of knowledge and education” (in What You Don’t Know About Schools, p. 39) he writes:

Those of us who want to study the workings of power, for example, via the deployment of signifiers and appeals to the unconscious know that such subtle processes fall outside the parameters of dominant ways of producing knowledge. As such complex modes of understanding are excluded from legitimate scientific inquiry, dominant forms of power continue to work at a level invisible to most people. In this way, dominant positivistic ways of seeing contributes to oppression of those who are “different” while allowing dominant science to continue its journey down a colonial path. Such a trek illustrates an intellectual  and moral stagnation that is camouflaged by the recovery  movement (Grossberg, 1992; Keith and Keith, 1993; Hess, 1995; Woodhouse, 1996).  [Again, the recovery movement relates to the far right wishing to reclaim their “place” in the world, their FIDURODian mindset for domination.}

It is in this stagnant context that I have proposed the notion of bricolage (Kincheloe, 2001; Kincheloe and Berry, 2004). The French word bricoleur describes a handyman or handywoman who makes use of the tools available to complete a task. In the context of scientific research, I use the term to denote the process of applying multiple research methodological strategies and theoretical discourses as they are needed in the unfolding context of the research situation. The point is to get beyond the monological colonialistic perspective of positivism and engage new ways of understanding from diverse intellectual and cultural traditions. The bricoleur works diligently to uncover hidden artifacts of power and the way that shapes the knowledge researchers produce. Of course the diversity of the bricolage offers an alternative to the monocultural ways of perceiving protected by the recovery movement.

On page 47, he continues:

Positivistic reductionism fails to discern the holographic nature of reality. This holographic effect is grounded on the notion that all parts contain dimensions of the whole. Many contemporary physicists, psychologists, and sociologists speculate that the universe, the mind, and the interaction between the society and the individual cannot be understood outside this holographic insight. In positivism, fundamental units of reality (or things-in-themselves) are not deemed to contain data about the larger constructs of which they are parts. Not realizing this dynamic, positivist researchers and educators see everything from atoms, bodily organs, brains, individuals, languages, curricula to television as isolated entities—not as things whose meanings can only be appreciated when viewed as parts of larger wholes and higher orders of reality (Woodhouse, 1996). Indeed, what I am concerned with here is nothing less than the quality of knowledge we produce about the world and how we confront such information in educational contexts. To counter the irrationality of right-wing knowledge work and pedagogy, we must address both the reductionism of uninformed research methods and the quest for new ways of seeing. [Emphasis added]

Note that by “world” Kincheloe is referring to both the world as we typically might consider it, but also in the way many other cultures and traditions may view this—as the entire cosmos. This can be confirmed in his reference to “higher orders of reality” and by his reference to the three components of bricolage: ontology, epistemology, and cosmology (see Rigour and Complexity in Educational Research: Conceptualizing the Bricolage, p. 61). His ideas are always all-encompassing due to his Great Vision, and this fact is what has also hindered many of us from wrapping our minds around the complexity and the enormity of the great works he has left us. We must do so in order to powerfully apply his ideas. But we can take baby steps; it’s ok.

One way to accomplish this is by using Joe’s multidimensional critical complex bricolage by which we examine not so much “things-in-themselves” but rather “things-in-relationship,” a process which tends toward a more “metaphoric” way of understanding. And we make no claims that our presented way(s) of viewing such complexities is the only way—it’s just one (or several) ways that give a unique view on something that’s otherwise so complex it would be difficult to understand. Adept bricoleurs ascribe to multiple views simultaneouslsy—even as they may only present one view! But it's important to remember that bricoleurs also develop criteria and ways to evalutate their metaphoric views (not all perspectives are equal). This, also, is part of the more rigorous bricolage process.

Thus, when I write of the Twin Flame phenomenon, while LOVE is TRUTH and TRUTH is LOVE (and perhaps this is the only TRUE TRUTH that really matters), in reality, I VIEW the Twin Flame phenomenon in many different contexts…it can be no other way as we come to realize the “fragmented” nature of “things-in-themselves” in which we are not able to see the whole from which the fractal or “holograph” has emerged from the “higher reality” that Joe discusses in the above passage. And again, I am speaking in metaphoric terms here…and now I will apply these to the Marriage of Science and the Conceptualization of Twin Flames/Divine Love. I will do this rather superficially for this blog; the analysis is quite profound when one delves into the multiple correlations between complex spiritual and physics concepts.

The fuel for this blog actually began with my having coming across a movie. There is much about the movie yet to be understood and analyzed. Had I seen the movie back in 1992, I would never have understood it to be about Twin Flames. The fact that it is, tells me that the message in the movie was perhaps designed for subconscious programming, since there’s a lot of violence in it. As Emanu’El (my consort by another name) informed me yesterday, the movie “was devised to manipulate the emotions, namely fear connected to love.” This is a powerful tactic that those in power use constantly, often beneath our conscious awareness. By having us store things such as what we view in movies in our subconscious minds, without awareness, they have a trigger to manipulate us. As ancient sciences present, “Good things go into the subconscious mind only when the good and bad are mixed together. Good things by themselves go into the Chalice” (Saradarian,  p. 28). The Chalice is what we really want to be filling. Thus, awarenes s is key; otherwise we have constant subconscious cleaning to do.

Here’s the movie (warning: it has nudity and violence):

Night Eyes 5 - (1992)- Full Movie - Shannon Tweed

CERN Scientists and Breaking through the Curtains of the Higgs-Boson Field

Moving on to PHYSICS, I will show how the Higgs-Boson and blasting protons relate to Divine Twin Flames…thus, we will Marry Science and Divine Love.

CERN stands for European Center for Nuclear Research. Since the acronym letters are actually backwards, I would guess there are other meanings which have not been publicly released…you might play around with possible meanings after learning more about CERN. Some people are very CONcerned about CERN (but since there is no “CON” in CERN, maybe their worries are unfounded). According to Wikipedia, our “trusted” source of knowledge, CERN is derived from the name "Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire" which explains the order of the letters.

Btw, I used to trust Wikipedia more than I do now. It’s clear that Wikipedia has been overtaken by those who want to control knowledge. It’s funny that when it was more of a public project than it is now, its use was discouraged by academia and now that it’s less useful because “ideological bots” tend to control the knowledge produced, it’s being more accepted by academia. There are ways to prove what I contend here: try a few changes to Wikipedia relating to “sensitive” or “dangerous” knowledge, and watch how fast it gets changed back. What you write can be a totally valid and supportable perspective, but if it does not match the ideology being presented it will get changed.

In fact, a great entry to change is “Critical Pedagogy” since it’s a topic you’re interested in (I assume you would not be reading this if you were not). The Critical Pedagogy entry is heavily biased and in many ways is incorrect, and it’s extremely ideological and seems to have been written by a particular “insider’s club.” The result is they present an extremely narrow view of what encompasses “critical pedagogy.” The true nature of critical pedagogy is far more diverse than is represented in the entry. Try it out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_pedagogy.  If you post something that doesn’t agree with the ideology presented or present a new researcher, it most likely will get changed or deleted. Try adding my name (Vanessa Paradis) as an “expert” of critical pedagogy and watch what happens.

And so, one must ask, who controls this entry? Why is Paulo Freire’s work propped up when, in reality, there have been many great “critical pedagogues” who are far more advanced and useful? And why are teachers currently being bombarded with uncritical presentations of Paulo Freire’s work? (There has been national promotion of Freire’s work in teacher development of public institutions). We must heed Richard Gibson’s warning provided in his well-researched dissertation about the danger of Freire’s work occupying corporate motives and supporting their insatiable needs for capitalistic control. Is Freire a
“Dead End”? In my own experience, with the exception of Joe’s work, critical pedagogy too often does not critically examine itself. Some of the “researchers” are perhaps the most UN-critically-reflective group of people “doing” educational research.

To clarify, I have nothing against Freire. I just think we all need to decide for ourselves how valuable his work truly is. I have great respect for Freire, and so did Joe. Part of that respect means honoring what Freire had asked: That he and his work not be put on a pedestal and that we go forward. Joe did that superbly!! And yet, people want to go backwards. I think Freire was very sensitive to the fact that his work has serious flaws and he wanted us to move past those flaws.

Thus, in my view, Joe honors Freire with his work, and we can all best honor Freire by moving forward. And if you truly come to understand Joe’s work, you will clearly see how it is “timeless” and will take us far into the twenty-first century and even beyond. That’s not to say Joe’s work is perfect; he suffered from FIDUROD as we all do (as he told me one time, we just need to stay “mindful” of it). But I can say with certainty: He definitely has it together more than 99.999999% of us!! And he has shown us over and over again, much like in physics where the left and the right are coming together, we can take the good from wherever it emerges,  combine it with his “radical love,” and create something new and amazing! We do NOT need to “annihilate” each other! 

When scientists state that matter and dark matter “annihilate” each other, this is a misnomer. This is sad because now what people have stored in their minds is that both are destroyed, but this simply is not true. They are both RECREATED! And it’s a good thing. (And particle physicists: pardon me if this is not precise or totally right: I am still learning). This epistemology relating to annihilation was developed before physicists had the understanding they do today, but as knowledge is often known to do: it sticks with nomenclature that may not be entirely representative of the true reality. What really happens is that when matter and dark matter (that invisible matter) particles combine, they create a new energy…and this happens to correlate with the divine union of twin flames. Twin flames, in their spiritual unification (which can be compared to an electric/electromagnetic union of forces), unite in those hidden dimensions (i.e. the Higgs field), they create what is described as a “third energy” which is greater than the two original energies combined….1+1=3. “The whole is greater than the sum of the parts” as Joe has often written. They become “Super Powers” lol (in MyStory). They are still two individuals, but they engage in Super Symbiosis, Super Synchronicity, Super Serendipity, and Super Synthesis (see my previous blogs about these topics)….thus, they also work and live together “as one.” In correlation with this concept, the Large Hadron Collider physicists are examining what they refer to as “Super Symmetry” between particles.

Thus, within the CERN conglomerate, of immediate interest is the LHC, the Large Hadron Collider, the Super Collider. A hadron is “any elementary particle that interacts strongly with other particles” (http://www.audioenglish.org/dictionary/hadron.htm).

If you listen to the videos below about CERN  carefully, you’ll discover how what I call “right hand” physics and “left hand” physics are coming together. This is a very good sign and thus, we might ask ourselves how this applies in life as well (especially given that science is life and vice versa). Interestingly, everything the scientists discover can be correlated with what some people regard as “metaphysical” experiences and tend to throw out from serious consideration. Even many right-path (right wing?) scientists are not making that mistake today. Had they continued to do so, they would not have discovered the reality of the Higgs particle. They believe they have found the particle. (Btw, it is not really a "God" particle).

Dr. Christopher Rogan, The CERN Super Collider, Searching for new particles, forces and phenomena

Big Bang Machine CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) Nova Special 2015 Documentary-documentary planet

The goals of Joe’s bricolage are exactly what help us combine knowledge in new ways in order to explore “new ways of seeing.” Bringing what seem to be “opposite” views such as traditional physics and theoretical physics suddenly opens up new understandings. Realities open up to multidimensionality. Thus, in my blogs, as I have explored these dynamics, my identity has become increasingly fluid as I learn to “see” through different eyes, so to speak. This allows me to present new “juxtapositionings” of what I see. Today, what I see is the strong correlation of what CERN scientists are discovering in their research of the Higgs particle and Divine Love. When visible matter and “invisible” dark matter particles come together in the Higgs field, they create new matter and new relationships. And it must be remembered that 96% or so of space is composed of dark matter; we are missing out on much if we don't develop better perception abilities.

My QUESTion is: Will breaking past the Higgs field set us free? (Or at least get us past another layer of our imprisonment)? Does this field hold the prison bars that has been keeping Heaven and Earth divided. Is what the scientists are doing at CERN similar to what the Doors sang about? “Break on through to the Other Side”? I like to think so. I like to think it could be a very great thing.

Some people don’t think so, however; they are conCERNed. . . the lack of knowledge can be more dangerous than Joe’s “dangerous knowledge” or as Joe put it above: “To counter the irrationality of right-wing knowledge work and pedagogy, we must address both the reductionism of uninformed research methods and the quest for new ways of seeing”:

Fire In the Middle Giza & CERN~7 ANGELS Metatrons CUBE /SATURN

Can these people come to greater awareness of the constraints of their epistemology, and by using a more hermeneutical approach, engage in the QUEST for alternative ways of seeing?

And finally, “Emanu’El” asked that I post this music with this blog (as representative of just one “new way of seeing”):

Human-Made Music:

Dispatched - Motherwar (Full-Album HD) (2000)

CERN-Made Music: 

LHChamber Music

 

If the LHC is creating a new dimension with new kinds of humans, I’ll go there!! Besides, the music is better and they’ve brought back dancing in the streets!

National Dance Day at CERN!

 

P.S. I JUST KNEW CERN and Particle Colliding HAD to be about MARRYING SCIENCE AND DIVINE LOVE, and here’s the PROOF by a Physicist:

https://youtu.be/nkJNk5JM-Mg?t=51m50s

(Just in time for Universal Love Week, April 1-7; April 3 is Universal Day of Love, as established in 2009. We will need to update our celebrations and music.)

 

ADDENDA 

The physicist with the creative presentation is: 

FRANK WILCZEK, from MIT
Herman Feshbach Professor of Physics
2004 Nobel Laureate

http://web.mit.edu/physics/people/faculty/wilczek_frank.html

Here’s an interesting article by Frank Wilczek:

http://web.mit.edu/physics/news/physicsatmit/wilczek_physicsatmit_2013.pdf

 

Free self-study physics courses:

http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/  

I wonder…did everyone SEE Jesus when he resurrected three days after he died? Or was it only the truly spiritually awakened people?

This “religious” question (which is actually also a science question) is significant for treasure hunting. The reason it’s significant is that for those who are (at least somewhat) spiritually awakened, there will be guidance from those who are resurrected. That means treasure hunters (aka "bricoleurs") must be able to perceive the resurrected. I will explore this right now. I will ask google (lol) the following question:

Who saw Jesus when he resurrected? (And note this: Maybe Jesus is midst us even yet today).

Wow! Check out Google’s chosen answer!

The first one to see Jesus after His resurrection was Mary Magdalene just as it says (Mark 16:9). Then the others saw Him afterward. The context of the other verses don’t present any problem at all.

This is exciting and highly relevant! Mary Magdalene is considered to be Jesus’s Twin Flame. [And check out the Celestial meaning of the numbers of that verse: 1+6=7, God’s Number and 9=Completion, as in Twin Flame Union].

Then apparently, when Jesus resurrected, the very first person he went to was his twin flame (sounds familiar, if you read my dissertation)….and we are not getting the whole story about our creation and our capacity for love, obviously! That reminds me, my Emanu’El-Sanat-Eros-Enki, et.al, has me on a treasure hunt relating to Abba Macarius, the Egyptian and something about an ancient, more accurate creation story than the Adam and Eve Story (see “A Big P.S.” at the end of this blog). Truth has been kept a secret for a very long time.

Of course, Joe changed that up with his work, but you will have to decode it, if you can, understand it, and then apply it, or you can simply follow along and watch as I continue to interpret his work.

You see, the Egyptians wrote The Book of Life (erringly called, today, The Book of the Dead; a good friend, the true Isis, is in the process of revising the book to be more in line with the original book); Thoth/Hermes Trismegistus wrote many practical works to help us achieve that Life (most of which were destroyed or lost, but there are a few yet in existence and many researchers are trying to retrieve that knowledge); and Joe came along and wrote what I like to call The Book of Love (his last book, Knowledge and Critical Pedagogy: An Introduction). Although, it’s important to keep in mind that the book has many layers of interpretation and, subsequently, many applications, but Divine Love is the highest dimension which he has woven through the book with a “golden conceptual thread” and which is “our ticket off the FIDUROD island” (p. 84). In other words, it is “radical love” (as Joe defines it; soul love) that will allow us to escape the limiting views of the Fidurodian “death/thanatos” worldview and do the switch-over  to the “eros/love” worldview.

It’s a huge challenge to rise above the death culture of the dominators in order to experience life and bliss-love, and expand our percetual abilities enough to see that the Resurrection has already happened. As Joe states, “There’s nothing easy about moving into a new dimension where things are not as they once seemed” (2008, p. 58).

I struggle to maintain that open perception, but so often get dragged back down by what Joe calls FIDUROD, the dominant worldview that people all around me seem to view as the one true reality, the point from which we are told that we all must “come together” and work together if we are to make the world a better place.  “3D” is, after all, the “real reality” and those of us who view reality differently are considered off-planet (and is probably why Jesus said he is “in the world but not of the world”). The people who require such constraints don’t realize that by imposing that worldview on everyone, they are essentially requiring that many of us must suffer painful devolution in consciousness which we are simply not willing to do, not to mention it also ensures that the majority stay functioning within that lower level “reality” longer, which actually hinders collective evolution. I have faith that human beings can do better! And so, it truly becomes that “amusement park ride” Joe discusses in his book, when one gets pushed and slammed around for BEing, and it’s challenging to stay at the top of the ride. But stay on top I must, if I’m going to fully experience treasure hunts and reap the amazing rewards, and most importantly, share all of the amazing magic with the world. Am I ready for this?

I merely mention all of this to let people know that I am the reason for the delay in the treasure hunts. I am having a hard time staying on top of the ride. The “gods” are ready for any one of us who’s willing to listen to them and allow their spirits and Great Minds, enhanced with the Holy Spirit, to work through us—via that “purple postformal thread” that connects them to us (Thomas & Kincheloe, 2006, p. 136). When you literally “see” purple, you are in the domain of perceiving the “gods.” And believe me, it’s a beautiful thing, beyond description.

Well, that’s all I have today as a sort of “check-in” saying, the hiatus is over, I’m still here, still struggling to “come out on top” and still having faith in my resurrected and beloved Twin Flame and Soul Family. I wish I had easy answers, but as I’ve just shown, there are no easy answers, and Joe makes that clear throughout his writings. It takes hard work. But it can also be fun work. I think what can really help is research and writing and if you can engage your passion into the project.  It will help you form a “feedback loop” that keeps you motivated and moving onward and upward. I know that Joe discovered that to be true. He wrote in Reading, Writing, and Thinking, “I can’t imagine a non-literary life—an existence without writing, without reading connected to my efforts to write, and without daily (if possible) reading, writing and/or researching. Indeed, in my mid-fifties I find writing to be a powerful narcotic that soothes me, provides me rushes of intense pleasure, and helps me live a richer life while making me a better teacher. Caution—it’s addictive” (p. 2). It’s what keeps us connected.

So, if you are one of those who are sitting back, waiting for the “resurrection,” you are missing out! It’s already happened. The Insurrection has begun and you are included should you choose to participate. Joe knew this, even back in 1995 when he wrote his article, “Meet Me Behind the Curtain. ..” and he has reiterated this throughout his work. As he states in Reading Writing, and Thinking:

The hyperrationality of domination embedded in postitivism and formalism must be held up to the light of day, so that we can get beyond the socio-cognitive roadblock they have erected on the bridge over the River Styx—the bridge that is key to our escape from the hell of dominant cultural authoritarianism (p. 138). . . I believe the postformal insurrection is immanent” (p. 140).

The purple light is on and it’s bright now. We can see our way to that magic bridge! I hope you join the Treasure Hunt Insurrection! It is sure to prove Divine, very informative, very exciting, very funny and entertaining at times (what do you expect when we also have Father Hermes as our teacher?), very musical, and very rewarding—and the result will be (as in all of Sanat Kumara’s treasure hunts of the ancient past): Thy cup (thy Golden Chalice) shall be brimming over with Divine Love.

References and more information:

Kincheloe, J. L. (2008). Knowledge and Critical Pedagogy: An Introduction. Springer.

Kincheloe, J. L. (1995). Meet me behind the curtain: The struggle for a critical postmodern action research. In P. McLaren   and J. Giarelli (Eds.), Critical theory and educational research (71-89). Albany, NY. SUNY.

The Second Coming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Coming

Thomas & Kincheloe (2006). Reading, Writing and Thinking: The Postformal Basics. Sense.

https://carm.org/bible-difficulties/matthew-mark/who-saw-jesus-first

http://www3.telus.net/trbrooks/12groups.htm

Jesus Resurrection Painting http://hqwallbase.com/images/big/jesus-resurrection-pictures-03-40-wallpaper.jpg 

 

A BIG P.S.

In reality, I have not been on a hiatus at all. Like, Joe, I must research and write and create every day. In fact, I started work on a new project for which we are seeking funding. You can receive my interactive, multimedia ebook, “Bricolage: Your Quick-Start DIY Guide” for a donation of any amount.  The book really is for beginning bricoleurs, from high school to college students, and in it you can learn some helpful processes that I use and some tips for getting A+ papers.

100% of the funds collected go directly into the hands of the Chief of an Indian Tribe on one of the poorest (if not poorest) Indian Reservations in the nation, who is lead on this project authoring a special educational book. If you can find it in your heart to donate to this great endeavor, visit The Reservation Book Project where you can find more information, how to donate, and how you can get your eBook.

The second thing I’ve been working on is the continuing critical complex bricolaging of a business. It’s a very slow process when bootstrapping a business with no bootstraps, but it does keep the mandatory bills paid for now and I remain in gratitude for that.

The third thing I’ve been working on is another book about multidimensional critical complex bricolage. I will be writing many books about this unique form of bricolage to put the “animal” in so many different contexts that absolutely everyone will come to understand how powerful it is for changing the world and they can begin using it in every dimension of their lives. It’s almost time to put the books on the open market.

The fourth thing I’ve been working on is blogs…yes, I have written and not posted many blogs. If you would like a copy of the blogs that fill in the gap between the last time I wrote up until today (a document more than 75 pages long), click on this link:

A Bricolage of Blogs and Spiritual Truths about Cosmic Law, the Resurrection, Who the Gods Are, the Immanent, Imminent, and Eminent Insurrection, and Much More!

In that series, I’ve covered some very important details about treasure hunting which you will need to know to reap the greatest benefit from the treasure hunts Coming up the Pike. PLUS I’ve included some heavily guarded secret and dangerous knowledge that has not been published anywhere else. I have also included some Divine research into Abba Macarius the Egyptian…did I find the ancient creation story?

And what else is NEW, but very, very OLD at the same time? The U.S. budget is set to increase the insane funding for the military by $40 billion while it cuts Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps, Head Start, Pell (Educational) Grants while increasing corporate welfare by decreasing taxes on the wealthy and multinational corporations (OurFuture.org).

Some things NEVER change!!  Good Luck to THEM when the Treasure Hunts as Led by the Gods (God’s chosen sons and daughters) begin!! Blessed are the meek, for WE shall inherit the earth. RAH for Treasure Hunts!!

I hope you had a great and  very energetic St. Patrick’s Day (a bogus holiday, but given I’m Irish, a holiday that is still near and dear to my heart in a different way than put forth by popular culture)--and I hope you have a productive rest of the week.

THIS WEEK’S HOMEWORK: Get the poison out of your water, food, and air. (Do something!)

The Great Culling: Our Water Official Full Movie