Epilogue: The Next Zeitgeist
The conclusion is just the beginning (Kincheloe,
2008c, p. 227)
The interpretations included within this dissertation represent perspectives but they are not just any perspectives;
they are supported empirically by the phenomenological and narrative data collected and interpreted. Dialogical comparative
analyses/synthesis, combined with many perspectives incorporating diverse cosmologies, ontologies, and epistemologies have
been used throughout. Understanding, which is based on interpretation as Kincheloe has illuminated, is socially constructed.
Thus, they are not just “made up” nor created out of my own “imagination.” The experiences are real.
Interpretations were selected for their contribution toward liberation, social justice, and making manifest love
in the world. There are additional interpretations and deeper analyses that can enrich and extend the findings, thus, this
research can be picked up and analyzed in future “Zeitgeists.”
The Next Zeitgeist?
One night, a friend who had been calling me every night after Joe
passed away commented out of the blue, apparently hoping it would console me, “Maybe he isn’t dead.”
“What do you mean?” I asked
“Maybe he didn’t die. Maybe
he’s a Pleiadian and went back to his planet.”
“What’s
a Pleiadian?” I asked him. He wasn’t very clear except to describe they are like humans but more advanced and
they’re from the Pleiades star system. He explained that he had known a Pleiadian at one time (Journal entry, January
4, 2009, 11:30 PM). That comment sent me on a long epistemological road trip until I was satisfied I had sorted out what I
believed to be accurate depictions. Multidimensional beings from the star system of the Pleiades, I call them the “Love
People,” because their eclectic philosophy is based on a strong foundation of a very pure and powerful form of unconditional
love. They are concerned about all of the problems on earth and they assist with consciousness evolution. Important in many
indigenous oral histories, the Pleiadians are recognized as being visitors from the stars who have come to earth during various
periods in history and are believed to be here now.
Science
has been constructed to prevent us from learning truth about our extraterrestrial heritage and true potential, according to
exo-scientists Jiang and Li (2007). Pleiadians have shared some of the same trials as earthlings and throughout the ages have
tried to share their experiences so that we don’t experience the same setbacks that could lead to the destruction of
the planet. “But at present, not enough people on Earth are listening” attest Jiang and Li. According to Michael
Salla, a leading exo-scientist, there are more than 20 types of extraterrestrial genes locked up in the DNA of humans, knowledge
which reportedly has been shared through transmissions from Pleiadians. Within this DNA “lies psycho-kinetic abilities
associated with the genetic memories of ancient extraterrestrial races” (Jiang & Li, 2007, para. 6) and genes also
serve as “devices for extracting information from the environment” (Ridley, 2003, p. 148). This provides a scientific
explanation for Kincheloe’s fourth dimension research. It may explain why my memories and psychic abilities have “unlocked”
as I have engaged in this research. According to Ridley, genes must be activated (e.g., create a protein) during the learning
process and they are at the mercy of us—our behavior. Thus, our act of remembering switches genes on; we do not simply
inherit memory (pp. 180–181). It seems Kincheloe’s words and research process could be the magic he had vowed
he wanted to create. Words, numbers, and symbols can trigger memory which in turn activates genes for various psychic abilities.
Thus, Pleiadians are thought to be ancestors of
the human race (and are we ancestors to them?). Their messages are meant to help people through the transformative and evolutionary
process to higher consciousness. I came to identify with the Pleiadians and the philosophy that’s presented by some
of the authors who allege to channel them (e.g., Clow, 1995; Marciniak, 2004; Quan Yin, 1996). These works helped provide
understanding and comfort as I moved forward with my research. I have recovered memories through visions, dreams, and telepathic
communication and guidance from my soul family of a “future” life. I have experienced a joyous life on a beautiful,
Heaven-like planet where consciousness is elevated and people live in complete harmony. Thus, with bricolage we are liberated,
free to enter a new “Zeitgeist.”
Conversations with Joe: Moving toward the New Zeitgeist?
The following are excerpts from a discussion with Joe about
the bricolage right after I had read the special assignment he had given me (as analyzed in this study). These conversations
took place from October 19–23, 2008. Bold italics highlight the implicate order of reality
(conversation within a conversation).
Joe Kincheloe: you know me
Sun,
10/19/2008 - 16:22 — Vanessa Paradis
Joe, you do know me.
It is obviously a very complex process, but given where it can take us,
it is definitely worth the time and effort . . . .This particular reading assignment (Kincheloe & Berry, 2004,
pp. 63-67) is great, Joe! And you provided it at the exact right moment. It helps me define and justify my
research problem and questions. I think you know me very well. Thank you, Joe.
Bricolage. Cool! I am ready for it (I think).
Thanks, with radical love,
Vanessa
I thought you'd like the bricolage
Wed, 10/22/2008 - 13:48 — Joe Kincheloe
Vanessa,
I knew you'd feel comfortable with the bricolage. . . . I
am obviously from a different planet. While undoubtedly, all research projects have to be delimited and made manageable, that process comes somewhat
naturally, I've observed, after one gets a multidimensional view of the object of study. Again,
glad it was helpful.
Again, Vanessa, you are on target—lol.
In solidarity,
Joe
Joe: I have an important question (I need help)
Thu, 10/23/2008 - 08:26 — Vanessa Paradis
I need your help to get off the ground with writing up my research pre-proposal
and then I think I will be fine - for a while, anyway. I have no idea how to do the write up and I’m hoping I will figure
that part out as I go, but I do need some help with the POET. . . .What causes people to go from “attraction,”
continued “engagement” to “passion” and “compassion” (Kincheloe & Berry,
p. 118) that fuels knowledge production in an online learning environment? How can more people experience it? What does it
take?
PS I relate to the feeling of being on the wrong planet! I have
actually researched this....
Great question,
Vanessa, it goes to the heart of the bricolage
Thu, 10/23/2008 - 08:36 — Joe Kincheloe
. . . the
beginning . . .